nanog mailing list archives
Re: .nyc - here we go...
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 19:17:39 -0700
--- johnl () iecc com wrote: From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
I haven't read enough, but what's to stop speculators paying the $186,000 then ...
Rather than asking random strangers, you can read the applicant guidebook and find out what the actual rules are: http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb ---------------------------------------- Ok, you're correct. I need to add that to my list of reading. I am just thinking about the digital divide getting larger (not smaller) as these places are writing about on their various technical mailing lists. That kind of money is not insignificant to them. scott
Current thread:
- Re: .nyc - here we go..., (continued)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Rubens Kuhl (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Paul Ferguson (Jul 02)
- Message not available
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Larry Sheldon (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Paul Ferguson (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Andrew Sullivan (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Paul Ferguson (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Kyle Creyts (Jul 03)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Joe Abley (Jul 04)
- Message not available
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Larry Sheldon (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Mark Andrews (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Paul Ferguson (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... John Levine (Jul 02)