![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: On topic of domains
From: Chris Hills <chaz () chaz6 com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:54:49 +0100
On 11/07/2013 15:27, Jon Mitchell wrote:
After .nyc thread, thought this IAB announcement may be of interest. http://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence-reports-documents/2013-2/iab-statement-dotless-domains-considered-harmful/ -Jon
Whilst I am not a fan of dotless domains, as long as one uses the fully qualified domain name (e.g. http://ac./), there should not be any trouble using it in any sane software. It seems that most people aren't aware these days that a fqdn includes the trailing period (by definition).
Current thread:
- On topic of domains Jon Mitchell (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of domains Tony McCrory (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of domains Chris Hills (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of domains Andrew Sullivan (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of domains Guillaume Parent (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of domains Mark Andrews (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of domains Geoffrey Keating (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of dotless domains Doug Barton (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of domains bmanning (Jul 11)
- Message not available
- Re: On topic of domains Jimmy Hess (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of domains Andrew Sullivan (Jul 12)
- Re: On topic of domains Larry Sheldon (Jul 11)