nanog mailing list archives
Re: Issues with level3?
From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:52:41 -0800
On 1/15/13 9:31 AM, Bruce H McIntosh wrote:
You realize that class-c address space was only found within 192/8 e.g. if you print it in hex, C0000000. so not only is it historically irrelevant but you're using it wrong anyway.On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:23 +0000, Warren Bailey wrote:I still call a /24 a class c too.. :/ lolMore efficient that way - "class c" uses fewer syllables than "slash twenty four" :-)
Current thread:
- Issues with level3? Network Operations (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Warren Bailey (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Bruce H McIntosh (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Warren Bailey (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? joel jaeggli (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Christopher Morrow (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Randy Carpenter (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Warren Bailey (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? joel jaeggli (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Joe Maimon (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Joe Maimon (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Warren Bailey (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 15)
- Re: Issues with level3? Joe Greco (Jan 15)
- RE: Issues with level3? Siegel, David (Jan 15)