nanog mailing list archives

Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats


From: Julian DeMarchi <julian () jdcomputers com au>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:23:30 +1000

On 01/10/2013 02:55 PM, Rob McEwen wrote:
But if your information is accurate and I understand you correctly, then
I agree that they shouldn't list the whole /24 in their PTR list if SOME
of those IPs *do* have PTRs.

My information is correct. The /24 is listed _only_ on the no-ptr list.

---
List Status

RATS-Dyna - Not on the list

RATS-NoPtr - On the list. Worst Offender Alert

RATS-Spam - Not on the list
---

--julian



Current thread: