nanog mailing list archives
Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:50:37 +1100
In message <50EE471C.7010409 () utc edu>, Jeff Kell writes:
On 1/9/2013 11:41 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:$GENERATE, as someone else pointed out, solves that problem for you? (Does it scale for IPv6? I can't recall - but surely this could be scripted too.) No. A /64 has 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 addresses. Even if you had machines that supported zettabytes of data the zone would never load in human lifetimes.Can you wildcard it?
No point. address -> name -> address doesn't work with wildcards.
(Still an IPv6 implementation virgin, just curious :) ) Jeff
-- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats, (continued)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Karl Auer (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Matthias Leisi (Jan 10)
- RE: [SHAME] Spam Rats Warren Bailey (Jan 09)
- RE: [SHAME] Spam Rats Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Jan 09)
- RE: [SHAME] Spam Rats Karl Auer (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Foster (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Andrews (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Jeff Kell (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Andrews (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John Levine (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Andrews (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John R. Levine (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Andrews (Jan 09)
- PTRs for IPv6 (was Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats) Lee Howard (Jan 10)
- RE: [SHAME] Spam Rats Karl Auer (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Måns Nilsson (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John Levine (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Robert Bonomi (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Tony Finch (Jan 11)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats JP Viljoen (Jan 10)