nanog mailing list archives
Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 00:36:08 +1100
For what it is worth I argued for removal of support for partially qualified domain names when looking at resolving the issues in RFC 1535. "ndots" was the compromise. I also argued for searches stopping on nodata responses. I felt and continue to feel both of these are security issues. If RFC 1535 came up today I believe that different decisions may have been made but give the political climate at the time that was the best I could get. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs, (continued)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Jay Ashworth (Feb 22)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Joe Abley (Feb 22)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Andrew Sullivan (Feb 22)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Eric Brunner-Williams (Feb 22)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Andrew Sullivan (Feb 22)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Barry Shein (Feb 22)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Cutler James R (Feb 22)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Jay Ashworth (Feb 22)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Jimmy Hess (Feb 22)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Jay Ashworth (Feb 22)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Mark Andrews (Feb 23)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Andrew Sullivan (Feb 23)
- RE: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Keith Medcalf (Feb 23)
- Re: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs Mark Andrews (Feb 23)