nanog mailing list archives
Re: TelePacific a good choice?
From: Mike Hale <eyeronic.design () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:10:05 -0800
I've used them at a previous employer, mainly for PRI termination but also for some transit and colo services. They were decent. Didn't have any major complaints. If IPv6 is important for you...per what Paul said, they probably wouldn't be your best choice. If IPv6 doesn't matter to you, they're good enough. On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Paul WALL <pauldotwall () gmail com> wrote:
The lack of IPv6 implementation: http://bgp.he.net/AS14265#_asinfo should be the only feedback you need. On 2/19/13, Jeff Harper <jharper () well com> wrote:Hiya, We're looking at TelePacific as a possible solution for some of our transit needs. If you have an honest experience with them, positive or negative, I'd like to hear from you. Simply email me off line with your experiences, thanks! Jeff Harper, CCIE (W) | www.well.com ip access-list extended jeff permit tcp any any eq intelligence deny tcp any any eq stupid-people
-- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
Current thread:
- TelePacific a good choice? Jeff Harper (Feb 19)
- Re: TelePacific a good choice? Paul WALL (Feb 19)
- Re: TelePacific a good choice? Mike Hale (Feb 19)
- Re: TelePacific a good choice? Jared Geiger (Feb 20)
- Re: TelePacific a good choice? Mike Hale (Feb 19)
- Re: TelePacific a good choice? Paul WALL (Feb 19)