Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

[Warren Bailey <wbailey () satelliteintelligencegroup com>]

At this point I think the topic has been exhausted. If you participate in
a conversation, try to chime in with thoughtful and insightful points.
We're on here to help each other, if you want to measure girth there is
probably a better venue to do so. I don't think anyone lost anything,
other than a vast amount of wasted time trying to decipher your claims and
opinion. It's easy to tell people how full of it they are, but if you're
looking for a venue to argue (we have all done it) you should move on to
greener pastures. If all of this is difficult to understand, I will
summarize: Acting like a prick on a discussion list makes all of your
opinions and concerns completely ignored. No one wants to deal with an
arrogant prick, especially one who says someone "lost" because your
opinion seems to be more valid to yourself.



On 2/12/13 3:03 PM, "Masataka Ohta" <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
wrote:

> Jason Baugher wrote:
>
> > Scott, I've been down this road with Masataka. over the last few days. I
> > gave up.
>
> You have lost instantly, because you insisted on 32:1, which
> makes expensive PON even more expensive.
>
> It's stupid to insist on 32:1 to have 6 trunk fibers and 31 drop
> fibers within a cable for 192 subscribers, because with 8:1, you
> only need 24 trunk fibers and 7 drop fibers.
>
> Your theory is not consistent with the reality.
>
>                                               Masataka Ohta