nanog mailing list archives
Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () massar ch>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:43:54 +0100
On 2013-02-08 16:13 , fredrik danerklint wrote:
to watch the latest Quad-HD movie"Multicast"-I'm afraid it has to be unicast so that people can pause/resume anytime they need to go... well you know what I meanWorks fine too with multicast, for instance with FuzzyCast: https://marcel.wanda.ch/Fuzzycast/(I did notice that this was developed in 2001 - 2002!)
You really think people did not have problems with the 1mbit links they had back then? And you really think that we won't have problems with Zillion-HD or whatever they will call it in another 20 years?
That works if you are only distributing Video on Demands content.
Thus the question becomes, for what would it not work?
"32 seconds after the later, after the initial delay, enough data has been received such that playout can begin" So we are back to the b..u..f..f..e..r..i..n..g.. thing, again? If you also want, for example, to have the possibility to distribute software, (static content as well), can you do that with Fussycast?
and: On 2013-02-08 16:17 , Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
And 30sec delay is unacceptable. You can use 10 cheaper VOD servers closer to eyeballs making it 1000 customers abusing the particular portion of the local access/aggregation network.
Read the documents and other related literature on that site a little bit further: you can overcome those first couple of seconds by fetching those 'quickly' using unicast. Yes, that does not make it a full multicast solution, but the whole idea of multicast usage in these scenarios: less traffic on the backbone. With this setup you only get the hits for the first couple of seconds and after that they have it all from multicast. And one can of course employ strategies as used currently by for instance UPC's Horizon TV boxes that already 'tune in' to the channel that the user is likely going to zap to next, thus shaving off another few bits there too... Greets, Jeroen
Current thread:
- The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network fredrik danerklint (Feb 08)
- Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network Jay Ashworth (Feb 08)
- Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network Aled Morris (Feb 08)
- Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network fredrik danerklint (Feb 08)
- RE: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network Adam Vitkovsky (Feb 08)
- Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network Jeroen Massar (Feb 08)
- Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network fredrik danerklint (Feb 08)
- Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network Jeroen Massar (Feb 08)
- Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network fredrik danerklint (Feb 08)
- Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network Jeroen Massar (Feb 08)
- Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network fredrik danerklint (Feb 08)
- Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network Aled Morris (Feb 08)
- Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network Jay Ashworth (Feb 08)
- RE: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network Adam Vitkovsky (Feb 08)
- Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network Saku Ytti (Feb 08)
- Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network joel jaeggli (Feb 08)
- RE: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network Adam Vitkovsky (Feb 11)
- Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network Aled Morris (Feb 11)
- Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network Saku Ytti (Feb 11)
- Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network ML (Feb 11)