nanog mailing list archives
Re: turning on comcast v6
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 21:37:35 -0800
On Dec 30, 2013, at 9:29 PM, Victor Kuarsingh <victor () jvknet com> wrote:
I think a new initiative to revive this concept will need to address the [negative] points from those previous experiences and contrast them to the operational benefits of having it available. I am willing to help out here, but we need some folks willing to put the use cases together which make a strong case (oh and they will need email stamina).
Or, alternatively, operators who care about this and vendors who are interested in accepting money to implement what the operators want could get together and form, oh I dunno, the Internet DHCP Task Force, which could specify/implement the standard way of solving this particular problem... Regards, -drc
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Current thread:
- Re: turning on comcast v6, (continued)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Timothy Morizot (Dec 30)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Ryan Harden (Dec 31)
- RE: turning on comcast v6 Tony Hain (Dec 31)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Ryan Harden (Dec 31)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 James R Cutler (Dec 31)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Dale W. Carder (Dec 20)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 20)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 Christopher Morrow (Dec 20)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 ML (Dec 20)
- Re: turning on comcast v6 David Conrad (Dec 30)