nanog mailing list archives
Re: The state of TACACS+
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:59:48 +0200
On (2013-12-30 08:49 -0500), Christopher Morrow wrote:
Nor accounting...
I think this is probably sufficient justification for TACACS+. I'm not sure if command authorization is sufficient, as you can deliver group via radius which maps to authorized commands. But if you must support accounting, per-command authorization comes as free gift more or less. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- The state of TACACS+ Robert Drake (Dec 30)
- Re: The state of TACACS+ Jonathan Lassoff (Dec 30)
- Re: The state of TACACS+ Saku Ytti (Dec 30)
- Re: The state of TACACS+ Christopher Morrow (Dec 30)
- Re: The state of TACACS+ Christopher Morrow (Dec 30)
- Re: The state of TACACS+ Saku Ytti (Dec 30)
- Re: The state of TACACS+ cb.list6 (Dec 30)
- Re: The state of TACACS+ Christopher Morrow (Dec 30)
- Re: The state of TACACS+ Christian Kratzer (Dec 30)
- Re: The state of TACACS+ Javier Henderson (Dec 30)
- Re: The state of TACACS+ Jimmy Hess (Dec 30)
- Re: The state of TACACS+ Javier Henderson (Dec 30)
- Re: The state of TACACS+ Jimmy Hess (Dec 30)