nanog mailing list archives

Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO


From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:41:55 -0800



--- owen () delong com wrote:
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>

I actually tend to doubt it. All of the people I've talked to from the major 
operators have said that the charges in IPv4 were not a revenue source, they 
were an effort to discourage the consumption of the addresses and/or the use 
of static addresses and to try and recover the costs of dealing with them in 
cases where customers were willing to pay.
------------------------------------------


Not jumping into the turd chunkin' contest, but this is not my experience.
The suits definitely want the money for income stream; small as it may be.  
I'd like to hear from others if their experiences are different.

scott


Current thread: