nanog mailing list archives

Re: The Making of a Router


From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner () cluebyfour org>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 07:23:36 -0500 (EST)

On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Andrew D Kirch wrote:

If he can afford a 10G link... he should be buying real gear... I mean, look, I've got plenty of infrastructure horror stories, but lets not cobble together our own 10gbit solutions, please? At least get one of the new microtik CCR's with a 10gig sfp+? They're only a kilobuck... If you can't afford that I suggest you can't afford to be an ISP.

+1

Build-your-own routers are perfectly OK for a lab environment if you want to tinker with something, but I absolutely would not put an all-in-one box that I built myself in production. You end up combining some of the downsides of a hardware-based router with some of the downsides of a server (new attack vectors, another device that needs to be backed up, patched, and monitored, possibly getting a new collection of devices and drivers to play nicely with each other, etc).

Doing this also requires all of the people in your on-call rotation to be experienced sysadmins / server ops, in addition to being experiences network engineers / NOC ops. There are a lot of occasions with a server where 'just reboot it' can make a problem much worse.

Route servers running Linux or *BSD are another story. There are many situations where they can be extremely useful, but they are not all-in-one route server/RADIUS/VPN termination/web server/user shell boxes.

jms


Current thread: