nanog mailing list archives
Re: ddos attacks
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:02:54 -0800
--- cb.list6 () gmail com wrote: On Dec 19, 2013 4:25 PM, "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net> wrote: On Dec 19, 2013, at 6:12 AM, cb.list6 <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:
I am strongly considering having my upstreams to simply rate limit ipv4 UDP.QoS is a very poor mechanism for remediating DDoS attacks. It ensures that programmatically-generated attack traffic will 'squeeze out' legitimate traffic.
I agree. But ... i am pretty sure i am going to do it. Trade offs. ----------------------------------------------------------------- If you don't mind, after your first legit attack reply back to this thread with the details, so others can learn from it when they're looking through the archives. scott
Current thread:
- Re: ddos attacks, (continued)
- Re: ddos attacks Edward Lewis (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks cb.list6 (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Dobbins, Roland (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks cb.list6 (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Dobbins, Roland (Dec 19)
- Re: ddos attacks Saku Ytti (Dec 20)
- Re: ddos attacks Dobbins, Roland (Dec 20)
- Re: ddos attacks Edward Lewis (Dec 19)