nanog mailing list archives

Re: Best practice on TCP replies for ANY queries


From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () mykolab com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:26:35 -0800

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Also:

http://openresolverproject.org/


Also, open resolvers are harmful to the Internet, so it would not surprise
me to see organizations to begin blocking any communication with them by
published lists open recursive resolvers.

- - ferg.

On 12/12/2013 8:23 AM, SiNA Rabbani wrote:


> http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Resolvers/
>
> The Internet will be a better place with less open resolvers around.
>
> --SiNA
> On Dec 12, 2013 5:32 AM, "Tony Finch" <dot () dotat at> wrote:
>
>> Anurag Bhatia <me () anuragbhatia com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Now I see presence of some (legitimate) DNS forwarders and hence I
>>> don't wish to limit queries.
>>
>> You are going to have to change your mind about this one. Open recursive
>> resolvers are a really bad idea, unless you can afford a lot of time and
>> cleverness to manage the abuse. Get your users to choose a more
>> appropriate name server, and restrict your name server to your local
>> networks.
>>
>> Tony.
>> --
>> f.anthony.n.finch  <dot () dotat at>  http://dotat.at/
>> Forties, Cromarty: East, veering southeast, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 at
>> first.
>> Rough, becoming slight or moderate. Showers, rain at first. Moderate or
>> good,
>> occasionally poor at first.
>>
>>
>
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 10.2.0 (Build 2317)
Charset: utf-8

wj8DBQFSqhvyq1pz9mNUZTMRAiXgAKCDaQ1KmlVCjXKffz0bVmHRGpbwxgCfXEk7
tHQx8SXtY/xNFLm2L3Uu8x8=
=tTIW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
Paul Ferguson
PGP Public Key ID: 0x63546533



Current thread: