nanog mailing list archives
Re: RPKI and Trust Anchor question
From: John Curran <jcurran () arin net>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 13:32:13 +0000
On Aug 6, 2013, at 12:25 AM, Doug Barton <dougb () dougbarton us> wrote:
John, Thanks for the update! It's good to hear that progress is being made. Is there a place where the challenges and solutions are being discussed publicly? It's interesting that you raise DNSSEC in comparison since the two technologies have many similarities. One of the things that made DNSSEC successful was the wide-ranging public discussion that not only led to concerns that would likely not have been uncovered otherwise, but also solutions to those and other problems.
Agreed. I believe that it is necessary to do the same with respect to any global trust anchor architecture for RPKI, and believe that much of this needs to take place initially in the IETF sidr working group. The first step of that process is to have an initial draft doc for discussion (which is presently being written by the ICANN/RIR technical folks.) FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN
Current thread:
- RPKI and Trust Anchor question Marcel Plug (Aug 05)
- Re: RPKI and Trust Anchor question Rubens Kuhl (Aug 05)
- Re: RPKI and Trust Anchor question David Conrad (Aug 05)
- Re: RPKI and Trust Anchor question Barbara Roseman (Aug 05)
- Re: RPKI and Trust Anchor question David Conrad (Aug 06)
- Re: RPKI and Trust Anchor question Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 06)
- Re: RPKI and Trust Anchor question David Conrad (Aug 05)
- Re: RPKI and Trust Anchor question Randy Bush (Aug 06)
- Re: RPKI and Trust Anchor question Rubens Kuhl (Aug 05)
- Re: RPKI and Trust Anchor question Doug Barton (Aug 05)
- Re: RPKI and Trust Anchor question John Curran (Aug 06)
- Re: RPKI and Trust Anchor question Marcel Plug (Aug 06)