nanog mailing list archives

Re: RFC 1149

From: Eric Adler <eaptech () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 22:15:25 -0400

Make sure you don't miss the QoS implementation of RFC 2549 (and make sure
that you're ready to implement RFC 6214).  You'll be highly satisfied with
the results (presuming you and your packets end up in one of the higher
quality classes).
I'd also suggest a RFC 2322 compliant DHCP server for devices inside the
hurricane zone, but modified by implementing zip ties such that the C47s
aren't released under heavy (wind or water) loads.

- Eric

Current thread:

RFC 1149 Ed Schweitzer (Apr 01)
- Re: RFC 1149 Eric Adler (Apr 01)
  - Re: RFC 1149 Jeff Kell (Apr 01)
    - Re: RFC 1149 George Herbert (Apr 01)
    - Re: RFC 1149 Jared Mauch (Apr 02)
    - RE: RFC 1149 Scott Berkman (Apr 02)
    - Re: RFC 1149 Owen DeLong (Apr 02)
    - Re: RFC 1149 TJ (Apr 02)
    - Re: RFC 1149 Jay Ashworth (Apr 02)
    - RE: RFC 1149 Jamie Bowden (Apr 03)
    - Re: RFC 1149 George Herbert (Apr 03)
    - Re: RFC 1149 Jay Ashworth (Apr 03)

(Thread continues...)