nanog mailing list archives
Re: Open Resolver Problems
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:58:22 -0700
Yeah, I thought so, too, but apparently the FCC and the SEC hasn't seen it that way for the past 20 years. Go figure. :-)
The FCC doesn't understand that 4Mbps customer-facing speed on the tail circuit alone does NOT define broadband in a meaningful way. The SEC does not understand that IPv4 risk and the lack of an IPv6 strategy should be a required risk consideration in a Sarbanes Oxley filing. I have little hope that these particular federal agencies will ever agree with me about such nuanced issues. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Open Resolver Problems, (continued)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Niels Bakker (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Jared Mauch (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Niels Bakker (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Mark Andrews (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Dobbins, Roland (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Mark Andrews (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Dobbins, Roland (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Paul Ferguson (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Dobbins, Roland (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Dobbins, Roland (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Dobbins, Roland (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Paul Ferguson (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Dobbins, Roland (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Dobbins, Roland (Apr 01)
- RE: Open Resolver Problems Jamie Bowden (Apr 02)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 01)