nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and HTTPS
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:46:26 -0700
-- for example: large Cable providers getting together and agreeing to implement a 100ms RTT latency penalty for IPv4
we do not see intentionally damaging our customers as a big sales feature. but we think all our competitors should do so. randy
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Don Gould (Apr 26)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jima (Apr 26)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS shawn wilson (Apr 26)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jima (Apr 26)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Mark Andrews (Apr 27)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Erik Muller (Apr 27)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jima (Apr 26)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Owen DeLong (Apr 27)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jima (Apr 27)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Randy Bush (Apr 28)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jimmy Hess (Apr 28)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Randy Bush (Apr 28)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jimmy Hess (Apr 28)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Owen DeLong (Apr 28)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jimmy Hess (Apr 28)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Owen DeLong (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jack Bates (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Owen DeLong (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jack Bates (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Owen DeLong (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jack Bates (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Michael Thomas (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Don Gould (Apr 26)