nanog mailing list archives
Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now
From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:39:57 -0700
On 9/27/12 5:58 AM, Darius Jahandarie wrote:
40Gb/s appears to be doing just fine in top of rack switches and datacenter distribution layer. Given that it's in most server NIC roadmaps in the relatively near term it doesn't have significant barriers to becoming the volume offering of choice. getting datacenters off of om3/4 multimode distribution is a long project however.On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Eugen Leitl <eugen () leitl org> wrote:http://slashdot.org/topic/datacenter/terabit-ethernet-is-dead-for-now/ Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for NowI recall 40Gbit/s Ethernet being promoted heavily for similar reasons as the ones in this article, but then 100Gbit/s being the technology that actually ended up in most places. Could this be the same thing happening?
Current thread:
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now, (continued)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now jim deleskie (Sep 27)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Rosenthal Phil (Sep 27)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Steve Meuse (Sep 27)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Masataka Ohta (Sep 29)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Jimmy Hess (Sep 30)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now joel jaeggli (Sep 30)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Masataka Ohta (Sep 30)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Tom Hill (Sep 30)