nanog mailing list archives
Re: Real world sflow vs netflow?
From: Joe Loiacono <jloiacon () csc com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:19:58 -0400
Peter Phaal <peter.phaal () gmail com> wrote on 09/24/2012 10:39:26 AM:
When a switch/router decides to sample a packet it records the ingress/egress interfaces and accumulates information about how it decided to forward the packet by examining its FIB tables. Each packet may take a different path, some may by switched at layer 2, others may be forwarded based on a local routing protocol like OSPF, and still others may be forwarded based on BGP.
OK, Well I guess I was thinking sFlow was primarily a switch oriented technology versus on a layer-3 peering router.
Current thread:
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow?, (continued)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Peter Phaal (Sep 22)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Dobbins, Roland (Sep 22)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Peter Phaal (Sep 22)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Danny McPherson (Sep 23)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Dobbins, Roland (Sep 23)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Peter Phaal (Sep 23)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Dobbins, Roland (Sep 23)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Joe Loiacono (Sep 24)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Jeroen Massar (Sep 24)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Peter Phaal (Sep 24)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Joe Loiacono (Sep 24)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Peter Phaal (Sep 24)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 24)