nanog mailing list archives
Re: the economies of scale of a Worldcon, and how to make this topic relevant to Nanog
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 19:41:07 -0400
I think you mean AT&T / wayport. They have ruined a number of hotels that I stay at. When you talk to support they always claim "unusual" event load due to the guests involved. I'm not expecting 50mbps in the room, but not getting past 256k or 512k defeats the purpose of asking me to offload their cellular network. (Which seems to not be congested by the same population). Jared Mauch On Sep 21, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Jo Rhett <jrhett () netconsonance com> wrote:
One of which I forgot to mention. Many of the hotels (I believe all Hilton properties at this time) have sold the facilities space for their wifi network to another company.
Current thread:
- Re: Big Temporary Networks, (continued)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Jay Ashworth (Sep 20)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks joel jaeggli (Sep 20)
- the economies of scale of a Worldcon, and how to make this topic relevant to Nanog Jo Rhett (Sep 20)
- Re: the economies of scale of a Worldcon, and how to make this topic relevant to Nanog Jay Ashworth (Sep 21)
- Re: the economies of scale of a Worldcon, and how to make this topic relevant to Nanog Jo Rhett (Sep 21)
- Re: the economies of scale of a Worldcon, and how to make this topic relevant to Nanog Robert Bonomi (Sep 22)
- Re: the economies of scale of a Worldcon, and how to make this topic relevant to Nanog Jay Ashworth (Sep 23)
- Re: the economies of scale of a Worldcon, and how to make this topic relevant to Nanog Jimmy Hess (Sep 23)
- Re: the economies of scale of a Worldcon, and how to make this topic relevant to Nanog Joe Hamelin (Sep 23)
- Re: the economies of scale of a Worldcon, and how to make this topic relevant to Nanog Jo Rhett (Sep 24)
- Re: the economies of scale of a Worldcon, and how to make this topic relevant to Nanog Jared Mauch (Sep 23)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Jay Ashworth (Sep 20)