nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Ignorance
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 10:09:37 -0700
On 9/16/12 10:06 AM, John T. Yocum wrote:
On 9/16/2012 9:55 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:I came across these threads today; the blind ignorance towards IPv6 from some of the posters is kind of shocking. It's also pretty disappointing if these are the people providing internet access to end users. We focus our worries on the big guys like AT&T going IPv6 (which I'm sure but they're slow), but these small operators are a much bigger problem. http://forum.ubnt.com/showthread.php?p=355722 http://forum.ubnt.com/showthread.php?t=53779 ~SethWow... my brain hurts after reading that. The saddest part is, there are folks with IPv6 allocations that simply refuse to implement dual stack.
I think Owen's head may explode if he reads it. ~Seth
Current thread:
- IPv6 Ignorance Seth Mattinen (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance John T. Yocum (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Seth Mattinen (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Justin M. Streiner (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance John Mitchell (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jimmy Hess (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance John Levine (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jimmy Hess (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance John R. Levine (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jimmy Hess (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Timothy Morizot (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Owen DeLong (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jimmy Hess (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance John T. Yocum (Sep 16)