nanog mailing list archives
Re: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories
From: Paul Thornton <prt () prt org>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:43:41 +0000
On 29/10/2012 19:25, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
Also, if you're doing IPv6, the performance metrics for many network devices can be a bit more of a moving target.
I'd almost be tempted to set up a few machines doing v6 only on the LAN, with some trivial to exploit telnet/SNMP access then invite them to scan the LAN and see if said machines are picked up.
My experience of these things a year or two ago was that most of these companies thought everyone had an internal flat IPv4 network in RFC1918 space and that was that. YMMV of course.
Paul. -- Paul Thornton
Current thread:
- Network scan tool/appliance horror stories Pedersen, Sean (Oct 29)
- Re: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories Justin M. Streiner (Oct 29)
- Re: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories Bacon Zombie (Oct 29)
- Re: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories Jared Mauch (Oct 29)
- Re: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories Paul Thornton (Oct 29)
- Re: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories Bacon Zombie (Oct 29)
- Re: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories Dan White (Oct 29)
- RE: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories Jones, Barry (Oct 30)
- RE: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories Chuck Church (Oct 30)
- RE: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories Jones, Barry (Oct 30)
- RE: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories Jones, Barry (Oct 30)
- Re: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories Justin M. Streiner (Oct 29)
- RE: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories Rutis, Cameron (Oct 29)
- Re: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories Ryan Malayter (Oct 29)
- Re: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories nick hatch (Oct 29)
- Re: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories Andreas Ott (Oct 29)
- Re: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories Dan Snyder (Oct 30)