nanog mailing list archives
Re: Coded TCP
From: George Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:35:24 -0700
I understand and believe in the value of erasure coding, though I want to see the latency effects here. But that model was very detailed view into an overly simple (to the point of operationally unrealistic) model. Bad example, for a research paper. George William Herbert Sent from my iPhone On Oct 23, 2012, at 8:57 PM, "Michael Painter" <tvhawaii () shaka com> wrote:
George Herbert wrote:Modeled with just simple FTP sessions? Ugh: they admitted to having MIT backbone packet traces to analyze, and then used that simple of a simulator...The practical benefits of the technology, known as coded TCP, were seen on a recent test run on a New York-to-Boston Acela train, notorious for poor connectivity. By increasing their available bandwidth-the amount of data that can be relayed in a given period of time-Medard and students were able to watch blip-free YouTube videos while some other passengers struggled to get online. "They were asking us 'How did you do that?' and we said 'We're engineers!' " she jokes. More here: http://www.technologyreview.com/news/429722/a-bandwidth-breakthrough/?utm_campaign=newsletters&utm_source=newsletter-daily-all&utm_medium=email&utm_content=20121023
Current thread:
- Coded TCP Rodrick Brown (Oct 23)
- Re: Coded TCP George Herbert (Oct 23)
- Re: Coded TCP Michael Painter (Oct 23)
- Re: Coded TCP George Herbert (Oct 23)
- Re: Coded TCP Michael Painter (Oct 23)
- Re: Coded TCP Masataka Ohta (Oct 23)
- Re: Coded TCP Daniƫl W . Crompton (Oct 24)
- Re: Coded TCP Cameron Byrne (Oct 24)
- Re: Coded TCP Daniƫl W . Crompton (Oct 24)
- Re: Coded TCP George Herbert (Oct 23)