nanog mailing list archives

Re: Issues encountered with assigning all ones IPv6 /64 address? (Was Re: Issues encountered with assigning .0 and .255 as usable addresses?)


From: Rob Laidlaw <laidlaw () consecro com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:16:48 -0500

RFC 2526 reserves the last 128 host addresses in each subnet for anycast use.

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Andy Smith <andy () strugglers net> wrote:
Hello,

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:07:50PM +0000, Paul Zugnoni wrote:
Curious whether it's commonplace to find systems that
automatically regard .0 and .255 IP addresses (ipv4) as src/dst in
packets as traffic that should be considered invalid.

On a separate note, one of my customers discovered over the weekend
that if they bring up an all ones IPv6 address in their /64
(2001:db8:1:1:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff) then they can't exchange traffic
with stuff hosted at hetzner.de such as archives.postgresql.org or
1-media-cdn.foolz.us. Seems filtered somewhere inside Hetzner.

I found the same if I brought up an all ones address in any other
/64 in the same /48 as well. Using ...ffff:ffff:ffff:fffe worked
fine.

I haven't had time to investigate further or tell them yet, though.

Is that sort of thing common?

Cheers,
Andy

--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting



Current thread: