nanog mailing list archives

Re: Internet-wide port scans


From: Darius Jahandarie <djahandarie () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:38:52 -0400

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:46 AM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:48:47 -0400, Darius Jahandarie said:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Scott Weeks <surfer () mauigateway com> wrote:
Want to re-write that section or should I respond now?  ;-)

I always thought it wasn't allowed because of 18 USC  2701, but
IINAL, would be happy to hear otherwise :)

If a portscan allows access to stored communications, you have bigger
problems.

In particular, my understanding was that since you're sending a SYN,
it could very well initiate access to stored communications (although
that may have not been the intent of the SYN). But maybe I'm wrong --
and even if I'm right, this seems like something that probably
wouldn't hold in court very well anyways.

-- 
Darius Jahandarie


Current thread: