nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:24:48 -0700
Wow and I thought nibble boundaries would make the math easier than HD ratios. Here's the breakdown for those who are mathematically challenged: n sites prefix 0 Nothing. 1 /48 2-12 /44 13-191 /40 192-3071 /36 3072-49,151 /32 49,152-786,431 /28 If you're managing more than 786,431 sites, then you should be able to afford to hire someone who can properly handle the math. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?, (continued)
- Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently? bmanning (Oct 11)
- Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently? Randy Bush (Oct 13)
- Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently? Måns Nilsson (Oct 13)
- Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently? Edward Dore (Oct 14)
- Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently? Scott Weeks (Oct 11)
- Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently? Randy Carpenter (Oct 11)
- Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently? Jo Rhett (Oct 11)
- Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently? Randy Carpenter (Oct 11)
- Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently? Justin M. Streiner (Oct 11)
- Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently? William Herrin (Oct 11)
- Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently? Owen DeLong (Oct 11)
- Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently? Randy Carpenter (Oct 11)
- Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently? Jimmy Hess (Oct 11)
- Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently? Randy Carpenter (Oct 11)
- Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently? Randy Carpenter (Oct 11)