nanog mailing list archives
Re: 100.100.0.0/24
From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 05:29:54 -0700
On 10/5/12 5:08 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
I'm unsurprised that not all filters are in place, more or less where they weren't however is another matter.http://bgp.he.net/net/100.100.0.0/24#_bogon A surprising number of large transit ASes appear to be more than willing to accept this prefix from AS4847.a private address space leak? and propagated. i am deeply shocked. wtf did people think would happen?
by all accounts this has been advertised since 8/24.
randy
Current thread:
- 100.100.0.0/24 joel jaeggli (Oct 04)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Christopher Morrow (Oct 04)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Anurag Bhatia (Oct 04)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Randy Bush (Oct 05)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 joel jaeggli (Oct 05)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Christopher Morrow (Oct 05)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Jared Mauch (Oct 05)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Ben Bartsch (Oct 05)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Jared Mauch (Oct 05)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Brett Frankenberger (Oct 06)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Randy Bush (Oct 06)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Vasil Kolev (Oct 06)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Randy Bush (Oct 06)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Nick Hilliard (Oct 07)
- Message not available
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Nick Hilliard (Oct 16)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 joel jaeggli (Oct 05)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Christopher Morrow (Oct 04)