nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 address length technical design
From: Barry Shein <bzs () world std com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 19:36:19 -0400
In Singapore in June 2011 I gave a talk at HackerSpaceSG about just doing away with IP addresses entirely, and DNS. Why not just use host names directly as addresses? Bits is bits, FQDNs are integers because, um, bits is bits. They're even structured so you can route on the network portion etc. Routers themselves could hash them into some more efficient form for table management but that wouldn't be externally visible. I did suggest a standard for such hashing just to help with debugging etc but it'd only be a suggestion or perhaps common display format. About the only obvious objection, other than vague handwaves about compute efficiency, is it would potentially make packets a lot longer in the worst case scenario, longer than common MTUs tho not much longer unless we also allow a lengthening of host name max, 1024 right now I believe? So 2K max for src/dest and whatever other overhead payload you need, not unthinkable. OTOH, it just does away with DNS entirely which is some sort of savings. There are obviously some more details required, this email is not a replacement for a set of RFCs! -- -Barry Shein The World | bzs () TheWorld com | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada Software Tool & Die | Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo*
Current thread:
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design, (continued)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Dave Crocker (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Jay Ashworth (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Jimmy Hess (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design David Conrad (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Eugen Leitl (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Masataka Ohta (Oct 04)
- Re: [tt] IPv4 address length technical design Eugen Leitl (Oct 04)
- Re: [tt] IPv4 address length technical design Masataka Ohta (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Barry Shein (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Mark Andrews (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design George Herbert (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Jay Ashworth (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Barry Shein (Oct 05)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Jay Ashworth (Oct 05)
- RE: IPv4 address length technical design nanog (Oct 06)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design William Herrin (Oct 05)
- RE: IPv4 address length technical design Spurling, Shannon (Oct 05)
- RE: IPv4 address length technical design Siegel, David (Oct 05)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design John Levine (Oct 05)