nanog mailing list archives
Re: 100.100.0.0/24
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 10:42:30 -0700
--- joelja () bogus com wrote: From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> http://bgp.he.net/net/100.100.0.0/24#_bogon A surprising number of large transit ASes appear to be more than willing to accept this prefix from AS4847. I'd be a lot happier if there were fewer. ------------------------------------------------- To save others the time of looking it up... :-) http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6598 scott
Current thread:
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24, (continued)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Ben Bartsch (Oct 05)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Jared Mauch (Oct 05)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Brett Frankenberger (Oct 06)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Randy Bush (Oct 06)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Vasil Kolev (Oct 06)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Randy Bush (Oct 06)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Nick Hilliard (Oct 07)
- Message not available
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Nick Hilliard (Oct 16)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 joel jaeggli (Oct 05)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Randy Bush (Oct 05)