nanog mailing list archives
Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:47:00 +0100 (CET)
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
Obviously, they deployed IPv6 for other reasons, and it would be far more useful to know *why* they deployed it in the first place (i.e., as an experiment, because their user base is outstripping their IPv4 allocations, etc.).
IPv6 deployment is not a short-term answer to IPv4 exhaustion. Can we please just put this to rest?
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration, (continued)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Dobbins, Roland (Nov 26)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Owen DeLong (Nov 26)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Dobbins, Roland (Nov 26)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Randy Bush (Nov 27)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Dobbins, Roland (Nov 27)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Randy Bush (Nov 27)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Dobbins, Roland (Nov 27)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Alex (Nov 27)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Dale W. Carder (Nov 27)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Ben Jencks (Nov 27)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 27)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Mark Andrews (Nov 27)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Owen DeLong (Nov 27)
- Message not available
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Tim Chown (Nov 27)