nanog mailing list archives
Re: Long and unabbreviatable IPv6 addresses with random overloaded bits, vs. tunnelbroker
From: Doug Barton <dougb () dougbarton us>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:50:36 -0800
On 11/18/2012 02:53 PM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
All I'm asking for, are sane and short addresses and/or a saner /112, don't really care if it's still a shared /48 underneath.
How do you define "sane," and why do you care? Doug
Current thread:
- Long and unabbreviatable IPv6 addresses with random overloaded bits, vs. tunnelbroker Constantine A. Murenin (Nov 18)
- Re: Long and unabbreviatable IPv6 addresses with random overloaded bits, vs. tunnelbroker Doug Barton (Nov 18)
- Re: Long and unabbreviatable IPv6 addresses with random overloaded bits, vs. tunnelbroker Sander Steffann (Nov 18)
- Re: Long and unabbreviatable IPv6 addresses with random overloaded bits, vs. tunnelbroker Brandon Ross (Nov 18)
- Re: Long and unabbreviatable IPv6 addresses with random overloaded bits, vs. tunnelbroker Bryan Fields (Nov 18)
- Re: Long and unabbreviatable IPv6 addresses with random overloaded bits, vs. tunnelbroker Jon Lewis (Nov 18)
- Re: Long and unabbreviatable IPv6 addresses with random overloaded bits, vs. tunnelbroker John Levine (Nov 18)
- Re: Long and unabbreviatable IPv6 addresses with random overloaded bits, vs. tunnelbroker William Herrin (Nov 18)
- Re: Long and unabbreviatable IPv6 addresses with random overloaded bits, vs. tunnelbroker Owen DeLong (Nov 18)
- Re: Long and unabbreviatable IPv6 addresses with random overloaded bits, vs. tunnelbroker Dan Luedtke (Nov 20)
- Re: Long and unabbreviatable IPv6 addresses with random overloaded bits, vs. tunnelbroker Jon Lewis (Nov 18)
- Re: Long and unabbreviatable IPv6 addresses with random overloaded bits, vs. tunnelbroker Dylan N (Nov 19)