nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 13:59:52 -0400
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:28:48 +0100, "Miquel van Smoorenburg" said:
We use a /120 subnet for servers to prevent the NDP cache exhaustion attack. We do maintain a mapping between IPv4 and IPv6 addresses; it's simply 2001:db8:vv:ww::xx, where xx is the hex value of the last octet of the IPv4 address.
ooh.. that's a clever approach I hadn't seen before. Who should we credit for this one?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Owen DeLong (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Tore Anderson (Nov 03)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Owen DeLong (Nov 03)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Tore Anderson (Nov 04)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Owen DeLong (Nov 04)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Tore Anderson (Nov 04)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Owen DeLong (Nov 04)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Tore Anderson (Nov 04)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP David Miller (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Miquel van Smoorenburg (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP joel jaeggli (Nov 03)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Randy (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Graham Beneke (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Karl Auer (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Eugeniu Patrascu (Nov 05)