nanog mailing list archives
Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too.
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 19:06:27 -0500
On 5/1/12, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net> wrote:
I love the fact Dominik says "from a CDN", then leaves Limelight's name in the text. :)
[snip] So a CDN made the mistake of attempting to monetize an existing peering arrangement without first having a signed peering arrangement in place for the existing peering with a Mutual NDA prohibiting any dissemination details of any of their communications/ future negotiations/etc of peering arrangement or traffic exchanged to unrelated third parties?? The lack of a NDA that would prohibit identifying a CDN and their e-mail notification of depeering, whether their name was mentioned or not, sounds quite un-Tier1 like to me. -- -JH
Current thread:
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too., (continued)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Mike Hale (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Patrick W. Gilmore (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Valdis . Kletnieks (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Valdis . Kletnieks (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Mike Hale (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Valdis . Kletnieks (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. David Miller (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Valdis . Kletnieks (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. William Herrin (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Joe Provo (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Jimmy Hess (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Valdis . Kletnieks (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Thomas Mangin (May 02)
- RE: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Leigh Porter (May 02)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Patrick W. Gilmore (May 02)