nanog mailing list archives
Re: isc - a good business
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 10:26:50 -0400
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 6:32 AM, paul vixie <vixie () isc org> wrote:
i'm paying more attention to the quoting this time, too.On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 04:33:28PM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote:On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:40 AM, <bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:Paul will be there to turn things off when they no longer make money for his company.is the dns changer thingy making money for isc?no. yes. depends on what you mean. we're under contract to the department of justice to run the servers. the amount is intended to be cost-recovery level. (doing stuff like this for nothing does not scale, unless the business is successful enough elsewhere, and even then there'll be limits.)
Thanks for the clarification. -chris (another bind user...)
Current thread:
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you., (continued)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Tony Finch (May 29)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Randy Bush (May 29)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Jimmy Hess (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Jimmy Hess (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Paul Vixie (May 30)
- Re: isc - a good business Andrew D Kirch (May 30)
- Re: isc - a good business valdis . kletnieks (May 30)