nanog mailing list archives
Re: rpki vs. secure dns?
From: Martin Millnert <millnert () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 21:19:21 +0200
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 21:50 +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
- the RIPE NCC is now funding a project for which there is no consensus policy supported by the RIPE community, and is doing this on the basis of a hair's breath majority vote amongst its membership.
Not only were the vote extremely narrow, a whopping ~97% of the voters did not vote at all. If we incorporate the no-shows, the vote statistics becomes something like: 120 Yes 114 No 26 Abstain ~7400 No-shows The membership got a chance to speak on the topic and largely didn't. Best, Martin
Current thread:
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns?, (continued)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Shane Amante (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Shane Amante (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Paul Vixie (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (May 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dobbins, Roland (May 01)