nanog mailing list archives

Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too.


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 13:26:07 -0400

On 5/1/12, Dominik Bay <db () rrbone net> wrote:
Yesterday I received the following mail, from a CDN:

---->8----
Greetings,

Limelight Networks [has] recently updated our requirements for
settlement-free peering

This letter is to notify you that yyy no longer meets our minimum
requirements.

Proposed solution:

Greetings,

Where settlement-free peering has been offered but rejected, YYY moves
all data traffic transiting that AS through a single minimum-cost
Internet connection (cough Cogent cough) with the attendant impact to
reliability. We appreciate the notice of depeering and will endeavor
to identify and advise those making paid use of our respective
services as to the impending impact to their activities.


On the technical side you can only easily enforce that for outbound
traffic. Essentially filter the routes containing their AS except from
your minimum cost link. Intentionally degraded service can be better
than flat refusal. Communication is two-way so even though the CDN
sends more than it receives this is still a credible threat. Your
customer sees perfectly good connectivity everywhere else and it isn't
a complete disconnect so your customer assumes its "their" Internet
connection rather than his.


I totally understand that some companies might not be able to handle
sub-5Mbps peering sessions, be it technical or organisational, but >=100Mbps
should be worth any effort, as long as it improves the network.

If I'm willing to go to your location, buy the card for your router
and pay you for the staff hours to set it up, there should be *no*
situation in which I'm willing to accept your traffic from an upstream
Internet link but am unwilling to engage in otherwise settlement-free
peering with you.

Your customers have paid you to connect to me and my customers have
paid me to connect to you. Double-billing the activity by either of us
collecting money from the other is just plain wrong.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


Current thread: