nanog mailing list archives
Re: pbx recco
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault () viagenie ca>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 08:39:09 -0400
On 2012-05-15 19:01, Tom Hill wrote:
On 15/05/12 18:00, Randy Bush wrote:i run a raw asterisk and would not wish it on my worst enemy.I've been itching to try Freeswitch
I know FreeSWITCH and Asterisk from the inside out because we ported both of them to IPv6.
Verdict:- Asterisk started ugly but is getting much better very quickly. They actually have paid professional coders working on it, and it shows. They started participating in the IETF. They recently implemented ICE. They're on the right track.
- FreeSWITCH started much prettier by reusing third-party libraries. But the glue code around these libs is absolutely horrendous. That glue code keeps growing and getting uglier. Their level of clue is dropping.
Right now, I'd pick Asterisk over FreeSWITCH. Simon -- DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
Current thread:
- Re: pbx recco, (continued)
- Re: pbx recco chris (May 15)
- Re: pbx recco Wayne Wenthin (May 15)
- Re: pbx recco Phil Regnauld (May 15)
- Re: pbx recco Roy (May 15)
- Re: pbx recco Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold (May 15)
- Re: pbx recco Robert E. Seastrom (May 15)
- Re: pbx recco Jared Mauch (May 15)
- Re: pbx recco Carlos Alcantar (May 15)
- Re: pbx recco Tom Hill (May 15)
- Re: pbx recco Thomas Mangin (May 16)
- Re: pbx recco Simon Perreault (May 16)
- Re: pbx recco Andrew Latham (May 16)
- Re: pbx recco Randy Bush (May 16)
- Re: pbx recco Thilo Bangert (May 18)