nanog mailing list archives
Re: bgp.he.net (was: Cogent for ISP bandwidth)
From: Rob Mosher <rmosher () he net>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:30:55 -0400
As previously mentioned, if you would like better representation in bgp.he.net, you can provide a feed to RIPE RIS or Routeviews, as this is where we get our data. If an adjacency is visible here, it is reported. We do not report false adjacencies. If you have a specific question about an adjacency, email me and I will provide the exact route with the AS path demonstrating the adjacency.
-- Rob Mosher Senior Network and Software Engineer Hurricane Electric / AS6939 On 5/15/2012 11:32 AM, Ren Provo wrote:
Keep in mind http://bgp.he.net is not always accurate. It is a great start but even after years of pointing it out there are adjacencies missing and oddly some listed as direct where no relationship even exists. On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Jason Baugher<jason () thebaughers com> wrote:I appreciate the reference to bgp.he.net, I had not used that tool before.
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth, (continued)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Tim Vollebregt (May 15)
- RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth John van Oppen (May 15)
- RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Paul Stewart (May 16)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Darius Jahandarie (May 16)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth PC (May 16)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Marshall Eubanks (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Darius Jahandarie (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Robert Bonomi (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Darius Jahandarie (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Mark Andrews (May 17)
- Re: bgp.he.net (was: Cogent for ISP bandwidth) Rob Mosher (May 15)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Jeroen van Aart (May 16)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth A. Pishdadi (May 15)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Peter Kristolaitis (May 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth A. Pishdadi (May 15)
- RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Frank Bulk (May 15)