nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth
From: "John T. Yocum" <john.yocum () fluidhosting com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 15:12:29 -0700
In my experience Cogent is fine when used in a BGP mix. When we used them, our service was quite reliable. Routing was funky at times, but we never had packet loss.
--John On 5/14/2012 3:03 PM, Jason Baugher wrote:
The emails on the Outages list reminded me to ask this question... I've done some searching and haven't been able to find much in the last 3 years as to their reliability and suitability as an upstream provider. For a regional ISP looking for GigE ports in the Chicago/St. Louis area, is Cogent a reasonable solution? Our gut feeling is that they don't stack up against a Level3 or Sprint, but they are being very aggressive with pricing to try and get our business. Thanks, Jason
Current thread:
- Cogent for ISP bandwidth Jason Baugher (May 14)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth John T. Yocum (May 14)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Michael J McCafferty (May 14)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Paul WALL (May 14)
- RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Scott Berkman (May 15)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Jimmy Hess (May 15)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Peter Kristolaitis (May 14)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Joe Maimon (May 14)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Michael J McCafferty (May 14)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth John T. Yocum (May 14)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Justin Wilson (May 14)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Jay Ashworth (May 14)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Jason Baugher (May 14)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Matthew Palmer (May 14)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Jason Baugher (May 14)