nanog mailing list archives
Re: Question about peering
From: Justin Wilson <lists () mtin net>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 10:23:16 -0400
We are cross-connected with several ISPs at a couple of data centers. Very helpful in one situation as several of us share a soft-switch. Justin -----Original Message----- From: Rob Szarka <szlists () szarka org> Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 4:50 PM To: <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: Question about peering
On 4/6/2012 3:11 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:I am curious to know how small ISPs plan peering with other interested parties. E.g if ISP A is connected to ISP C via big backbone ISP B, and say A and C both have open peering policy and assuming the exist in same exchange or nearby. Now at this point is there is any "minimum bandwidth" considerations? Say if A and C have 1Gbps + of flowing traffic - very likely peering would be good idea to save transit costs to B. But if A and C have very low levels - does it still makes sense? Does peering costs anything if ISPs are in same exchange? Does at low traffic level it makes more sense to keep on reaching other ISPs via big transit provider?One thing to consider is that peering can benefit both networks not just because of bandwidth savings, but because (given sufficient clue) they can deliver better performance and reliability to their mutual customers.
Current thread:
- Re: Question about peering Rob Szarka (May 09)
- Re: Question about peering Justin Wilson (May 10)
- Re: Question about peering Matt Chung (May 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Question about peering Keegan Holley (May 09)
- Re: Question about peering Justin Wilson (May 10)