nanog mailing list archives
Re: rpki vs. secure dns?
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 09:10:41 -0700
Roland, On May 1, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On May 1, 2012, at 8:18 PM, David Conrad wrote:It's hard to take seriously any proposal which is predicated upon recursive dependencies.Do you mean the need to be able to use [X] to fetch the data to enable you to use [X]?A lot more than just [X] is necessary in order to allow [X] transactions to work. ... - in this context, I'm specifically referring to routing.
So, you're saying that the entire RPKI+BGPSEC effort is hard for you to take seriously. OK. Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Russ White (May 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dobbins, Roland (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dobbins, Roland (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dobbins, Roland (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Russ White (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dobbins, Roland (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Paul Vixie (May 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? paul vixie (May 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? paul vixie (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Russ White (May 01)