nanog mailing list archives
Re: mulcast assignments
From: Greg Shepherd <gjshep () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 13:00:49 -0700
Sure, but GLOP predated SSM, and was really only an interim fix for the presumed need of mcast address assignments. GLOP only gives you a /24 for each ASN where SSM gives you a /8 for every unique unicast address you have along with vastly superior security and network simplicity. Greg On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Quentin Carpent <quentin.carpent () vtx-telecom ch> wrote:
You can also use the glop IP addressing: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3180 Quentin -----Original Message----- From: Greg Shepherd [mailto:gjshep () gmail com] Sent: Thu 5/3/2012 9:35 PM To: Philip Lavine Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: mulcast assignments Why do you think you need an assigned mcast block? All inter domain mcast uses source trees only, so just use SSM and you don't need address assignments. Greg On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Philip Lavine <source_route () yahoo com> wrote:How do I get a registered multicast block?
Current thread:
- mulcast assignments Philip Lavine (May 03)
- Re: mulcast assignments Greg Shepherd (May 03)
- RE: mulcast assignments Quentin Carpent (May 03)
- Re: mulcast assignments Greg Shepherd (May 03)
- Re: mulcast assignments Owen DeLong (May 03)
- Re: mulcast assignments Greg Shepherd (May 03)
- Re: mulcast assignments Valdis . Kletnieks (May 03)
- Re: mulcast assignments Greg Shepherd (May 03)
- RE: mulcast assignments Quentin Carpent (May 03)
- Re: mulcast assignments Greg Shepherd (May 03)
- Re: mulcast assignments Nick Hilliard (May 03)
- Re: mulcast assignments Greg Shepherd (May 03)
- Re: mulcast assignments PC (May 03)
- Re: mulcast assignments Jeff Tantsura (May 03)
- Re: mulcast assignments Marshall Eubanks (May 04)
- Re: mulcast assignments Jeff Tantsura (May 04)