RE: VoIP/Mobile Codecs (was Re: Operation Ghost Click)

["Brandt, Ralph" <ralph.brandt () pateam com>]

I am not worried about the voice quality as long as it is understandable.  What I am concerned about is, "Can someone 
who needs help get through?



Ralph Brandt


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeroen van Aart [mailto:jeroen () mompl net] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 7:40 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: VoIP/Mobile Codecs (was Re: Operation Ghost Click)

Sean Harlow wrote:
> Originally, you said VoIP and cellular used bad codecs.  

Yeah, I overlooked that important detail, sorry.

> The cellular world works with less bandwidth and more loss than the VoIP world usually deals with, so while us VoIP 
> guys sometimes use their codecs (GSM for example) they don't tend to bother with ours. 

Agreed.

> That said, the article you link is talking about the same sort of improvements by doubling the sampling rate, so the 
> end result is similar.

Yes, but it shouldn't be necessary to offer these "HD" services as an 
extra. It should be standard.

Greetings,
Jeroen

-- 
Earthquake Magnitude: 4.0
Date: Wednesday, May  2, 2012 12:33:29 UTC
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada region
Latitude: 50.6619; Longitude: -129.8861
Depth: 10.00 km