nanog mailing list archives
Re: shared address space... a reality!
From: Tim Chown <tjc () ecs soton ac uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:18:14 +0000
On 15 Mar 2012, at 21:03, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:35:13 PDT, George Herbert said:What, senior network people testing out new test/transitional space at home before they test it at work is bad?Either that, or Randy was being snarky about how long the promise to *only* use the address space for numbering CGN interfaces and not as additional RFC1918 space was going to last in reality....
So where is that new /10 leaking to already? ;). Tim
Current thread:
- Re: shared address space... a reality!, (continued)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Masataka Ohta (Mar 15)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Jérôme Nicolle (Mar 15)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! George Herbert (Mar 15)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Robert E. Seastrom (Mar 15)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Benson Schliesser (Mar 15)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! George Herbert (Mar 15)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Robert E. Seastrom (Mar 15)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! William Herrin (Mar 15)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Jimmy Hess (Mar 15)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)
- Message not available
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Tim Chown (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Christopher Morrow (Mar 14)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Nate Davis (Mar 14)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Christopher Morrow (Mar 14)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! John Curran (Mar 15)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Christopher Morrow (Mar 15)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Christopher Morrow (Mar 16)