nanog mailing list archives
Re: Programmers with network engineering skills
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner () nic-naa net>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:13:25 -0500
In my experience the path of least resistance is to get a junior network engineer and ...
agree, where the end goal is to increment the facility's scripting capable administrators. been there, done that. disagree, where the end goal is to create a coherent distributed system with a non-trivial lifecycle, release schedule, documentation, i18n/l10n capabilities and deliverables, resembling an operating system product. been there, done that. where i'm looking at gray is platforms built atop of platforms. for mpi, pvm and similar (b) is the better choice. for grid computing, i suspect (a) may answer. -e
Current thread:
- Re: Programmers with network engineering skills Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Mar 02)
- Re: Programmers with network engineering skills Eric Brunner-Williams (Mar 02)
- Re: Programmers with network engineering skills Randy Bush (Mar 02)
- Re: Programmers with network engineering skills Keegan Holley (Mar 02)
- Re: Programmers with network engineering skills Randy Bush (Mar 02)
- Re: Programmers with network engineering skills Keegan Holley (Mar 05)
- Re: Programmers with network engineering skills Keegan Holley (Mar 02)
- Re: Programmers with network engineering skills Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Mar 05)
- Re: Programmers with network engineering skills Scott Helms (Mar 05)
- Global Naps? Mark Stevens (Mar 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Global Naps? Mark Stevens (Mar 05)
- Re: Global Naps? Doug Barton (Mar 05)
- Re: Programmers with network engineering skills Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Mar 05)