nanog mailing list archives
Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:45:19 -0700
On Mar 14, 2012, at 9:18 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:13:41 PDT, Owen DeLong said:I expect within my lifetime that multi-gigabit ethernet will become commonplace in the household LAN environment and that when that becomes reality, localized IP Multicast over multi-gigabit ethernet will eventually supplant HDMI as the primary transport for audio/video streams between devices (sources such as BD players, DVRs, computers, etc. and destinations such as receivers/amps, monitors, speaker drivers, etc.).The only reason you got HDMI at all was because the content owners managed to get HDCP included. You won't get a replacement that doesn't do HDCP until we fix the sorry state of copyright in the US. So it's equivalent to asking if we're going to fix copyright within your lifetime... :)
I fully expect them to develop an HDCP-or-equivalent enabled protocol to run over IP Multicast. Do you have any reason you believe that won't happen? Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary, (continued)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Ryan Malayter (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Ryan Malayter (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Ryan Malayter (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 14)
- RE: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leigh Porter (Mar 14)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Mike Andrews (Mar 14)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Robert Bonomi (Mar 14)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 14)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Josh Hoppes (Mar 14)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 14)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Tim Franklin (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)