nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS poisoning at Google?
From: Michael J Wise <mjwise () kapu net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:36:43 -0700
On Jun 27, 2012, at 12:06 AM, Matthew Black wrote:
We found the aberrant .htaccess file and have removed it. What a mess!
Trusting you carefully noted the date/time stamp before removing it, as that's an important bit of forensics. Aloha, Michael. -- "Please have your Internet License and Usenet Registration handy..."
Current thread:
- RE: DNS poisoning at Google?, (continued)
- RE: DNS poisoning at Google? Matthew Black (Jun 26)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Christopher Morrow (Jun 26)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Landon Stewart (Jun 26)
- RE: DNS poisoning at Google? Matthew Black (Jun 26)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Grant Ridder (Jun 26)
- Message not available
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Grant Ridder (Jun 26)
- RE: DNS poisoning at Google? Matthew Black (Jun 27)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Bryan Irvine (Jun 27)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Ishmael Rufus (Jun 27)
- RE: DNS poisoning at Google? Ian McDonald (Jun 27)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Michael J Wise (Jun 27)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? TR Shaw (Jun 27)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? AP NANOG (Jun 27)
- RE: DNS poisoning at Google? Matthew Black (Jun 27)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Bryan Irvine (Jun 27)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Jason Hellenthal (Jun 26)
- Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Daniel Rohan (Jun 27)
- Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Arturo Servin (Jun 27)
- Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Jason Hellenthal (Jun 27)