nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Multi-homing (was IPv6 /64 links)


From: Douglas Otis <dotis () mail-abuse org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:06:15 -0700

On 6/25/12 12:20 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Douglas Otis
<dotis () mail-abuse org> wrote:
On 6/25/12 7:54 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
It would have been better if IETF had actually solved this
instead of punting on it when developing IPv6.

The IETF offered a HA solution that operates at the transport
level. The transport is SCTP

Hi Douglas,

SCTP proposes a solution to multihoming by multi-addressing each 
server. Each address represents one of the leaf node's paths to
the Internet and if one fails an SCTP session can switch to the
other. Correct?

Dear William,

Yes. An SCTP association periodically checks alternate path
functionality.

How does SCTP address the most immediate problem with
multiaddressed TCP servers: the client doesn't rapidly find a
currently working address from the set initially offered by A and
AAAA DNS records. Is there anything in the SCTP protocol for this?
Or does it handle it exactly the way TCP does (nothing at all in
the API; app-controlled timeout and round robin)?

This is addressed by deprecating use of TCP, since SCTP offers a
super-set of the socket API.  It can also dramatically expand the
number of virtual associations supported in a manner similar to that
of UDP while still mitigating source spoofing.

Is the SCTP API drop-in compatible with TCP where a client can
change a parameter in a socket() call and expect it to try SCTP and
promptly fall back to TCP if no connection establishes? On the
server side, does it work like the IPv6 API where one socket
accepts both protocols? Or do the apps have to be redesigned to
handle both SCTP and TCP?

The SCTP socket API is defined by:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6458

As the world adopts IPv6, NAT issues become a bad memory of
insecure middle boxes replaced by transports that can be as robust as
necessary.  IMHO, TCP is the impediment preventing simplistic
(hardware based) high speed interfaces able to avoid buffer bloat.

Regards,
Douglas Otis







Current thread: